Hi! > so what i meant (and i hope this is in line with jason harrop, the > project leader) is, that webdavclient4j should be the default library > (as it is slide at the moment) used for vfs' webdav providers. > therefore it would be necessary to take over webdavclient4j's vfs > providers (webdav and webdavs) to commons-vfs, exactly as you > mentioned it. Yep, if Jason is providing a release of the webdavlib4j core through an public maven repository we can go that route.
Ciao, Mario --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
