Hi Bruno,

> The EXIF tags in imaging should match what's in this page:
> https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html
>
> Which contains the XPComment and UserComment tags you mentioned, but no 
> equivalent to the other comment one.

this is quite inetersting. Actually I have been told that the command:

exiftool -comment='mycomment'

creates exaclty the comment I am not able to reproduce. Do you know
what that is?


> If you really need to match that tag, then I think you should be able to 
> create your own custom metadata entry.
>
> I think [1] the ExifRewriter and its test class have some code that shows how 
> to rewrite metadata. Find the directory (TiffOutputDirectory.java) with the 
> metadata fields, perhaps remove the UserComment/XPComment if necessary, and 
> then add a new field (TiffOutputField.java), with your metadata tag 
> (TagInfo.java)

I will try again. I tried already that path, but since it asks me for
a tag (integer) I then end up to have it named as the tag I am trying
to substitute...

Thanks,
Andrea


>
>
> Hope that helps,
> Bruno
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/jpeg/exif/ExifRewriter.java
>
> ________________________________
> From: andrea antonello <[email protected]>
> To: Commons Users List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2018 1:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem
>
>
>
> Hi Bruno,
> thanks for your reply.
>
>> I think you tried to include screenshots? If so, it doesn't work very well 
>> in this mailing list.
>
>
> ohh, I didn't figure and didn't notice.
>
>>
>> Could you try adding as attachment, or upload them, or use plain text to 
>> describe the issue? I recently had to work on the tags for some TIFF & JPEG 
>> metadata in [imaging], so hopefully we will be able to locate the right tag.
>
>
> Fantastic. I investigated further but am still not able to solve this.
>
> The tag I would like to update is one that produces (at least this is
> what I read in the imagemagick image info) a section
>
> Properties:
>
> and under start section I find
>
> comment: 
> GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
>
> The most similar result I have been able to produce with the tags is:
>
> exif:UserComment:GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
>
> and
>
> exif:WinXP-Comments:GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
>
> both not the same as what i am looking for.
>
>
> I have been able to print the following information through an
> application called exifprobe:
>
> @0x0000002=2       :    <JPEG_COM> length 137:
> ''GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000\0''
> @0x000008d=141     :    <JPEG_APP0> 0xffe0 length 16, 'JFIF'
> @0x0000096=150     :      Version       = 1.1
> @0x0000098=152     :      Units         = 'dots/inch'
> @0x0000099=153     :      Xdensity      = 96
> @0x000009b=155     :      Ydensity      = 96
> @0x000009d=157     :      XThumbnail    = 0
> @0x000009e=158     :      YThumbnail    = 0
> @0x000009e=158     :    </JPEG_APP0>
> @0x000009f=159     :    <JPEG_DQT> length 67
> @0x00000e4=228     :    <JPEG_DQT> length 67
> @0x0000129=297     :    <JPEG_SOF_0> length 17, 8 bits/sample,
> components=3, width=1608, height=901
> @0x000013c=316     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 31 table class = 0 table id = 0
> @0x000015d=349     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 181 table class = 0 table id = 1
> @0x0000214=532     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 31 table class = 1 table id = 0
> @0x0000235=565     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 181 table class = 1 table id = 1
> @0x00002ec=748     :    <JPEG_SOS> length 12  start of JPEG data, 3
> components 1448808 pixels
> @0x006b1a4=438692  :  <JPEG_EOI> JPEG length 438694
>
> So I think this (JPEG_COM) is not an exif tag as I had been told. I am
> guessing this is reflected by the library's ComSegment class, but I
> could not find any documentation or testcase which would tell me what
> it is and how to rewrite/update it.
>
> Any help is most appreciated,
> Thanks,
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>>
>> CheersBruno
>>
>>
>>       From: andrea antonello <[email protected]>
>>  To: Commons Users List <[email protected]>
>>  Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2018 1:56 AM
>>  Subject: [imaging] Comment tag problem
>>
>> Hi, I need some help to find the right tag to use to recreate a tag in a
>> jpeg file.
>>
>> Here is the output of the info given by ImageMagick:
>>
>>
>>
>> The tag I need should be under "Properties"
>> and be named: comment
>>
>> I have tried to use user_comment and xpcomment, but they produce something
>> different, like:
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone tell me which tag I can use to generate the "comment" tag?
>>
>> Thanks for any hint,
>> Best regards,
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to