> I normally use exiftool to compare what imaging is producing. The htmldump is 
> quite useful.

I just ran the normal info extraction and here you see the comment I
would like to reproduce (Comment):

ExifTool Version Number         : 10.94
File Name                       : 109_Background.jpg
Directory                       : .
File Size                       : 428 kB
File Modification Date/Time     : 2018:03:31 11:01:51+02:00
File Access Date/Time           : 2018:04:26 08:59:06+02:00
File Inode Change Date/Time     : 2018:03:31 11:01:56+02:00
File Permissions                : rw-rw-r--
File Type                       : JPEG
File Type Extension             : jpg
MIME Type                       : image/jpeg
Comment                         :
GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
JFIF Version                    : 1.01
Resolution Unit                 : inches
X Resolution                    : 96
Y Resolution                    : 96
Image Width                     : 1608
Image Height                    : 901
Encoding Process                : Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample                 : 8
Color Components                : 3
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling            : YCbCr4:2:0 (2 2)
Image Size                      : 1608x901
Megapixels                      : 1.4


> I thought you had to create the tag in Java, but if you can use other tools 
> and it's easier for you, then that might be the best option.

Yes, I do have to recreate it in java. I was just trying to use other
tools to check what the comment tag is.
Do you have an idea on how to create the above Comment tag?

> Otherwise you can create pretty much any other metadata tag you'd like with 
> some Java coding.

That is what I would love to end up with.
Thanks a ton,
Andrea


> ________________________________
> From: andrea antonello <[email protected]>
> To: Commons Users List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2018 7:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem
>
>
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
>> The EXIF tags in imaging should match what's in this page:
>> https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html
>>
>> Which contains the XPComment and UserComment tags you mentioned, but no 
>> equivalent to the other comment one.
>
> this is quite inetersting. Actually I have been told that the command:
>
> exiftool -comment='mycomment'
>
> creates exaclty the comment I am not able to reproduce. Do you know
> what that is?
>
>
>> If you really need to match that tag, then I think you should be able to 
>> create your own custom metadata entry.
>>
>> I think [1] the ExifRewriter and its test class have some code that shows 
>> how to rewrite metadata. Find the directory (TiffOutputDirectory.java) with 
>> the metadata fields, perhaps remove the UserComment/XPComment if necessary, 
>> and then add a new field (TiffOutputField.java), with your metadata tag 
>> (TagInfo.java)
>
> I will try again. I tried already that path, but since it asks me for
> a tag (integer) I then end up to have it named as the tag I am trying
> to substitute...
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea
>
>
>>
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/jpeg/exif/ExifRewriter.java
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: andrea antonello <[email protected]>
>> To: Commons Users List <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2018 1:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: [imaging] Comment tag problem
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Bruno,
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>>> I think you tried to include screenshots? If so, it doesn't work very well 
>>> in this mailing list.
>>
>>
>> ohh, I didn't figure and didn't notice.
>>
>>>
>>> Could you try adding as attachment, or upload them, or use plain text to 
>>> describe the issue? I recently had to work on the tags for some TIFF & JPEG 
>>> metadata in [imaging], so hopefully we will be able to locate the right tag.
>>
>>
>> Fantastic. I investigated further but am still not able to solve this.
>>
>> The tag I would like to update is one that produces (at least this is
>> what I read in the imagemagick image info) a section
>>
>> Properties:
>>
>> and under start section I find
>>
>> comment: 
>> GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
>>
>> The most similar result I have been able to produce with the tags is:
>>
>> exif:UserComment:GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
>>
>> and
>>
>> exif:WinXP-Comments:GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000
>>
>> both not the same as what i am looking for.
>>
>>
>> I have been able to print the following information through an
>> application called exifprobe:
>>
>> @0x0000002=2       :    <JPEG_COM> length 137:
>> ''GEO-Information,46.5640616313:11.523790723,46.5640616313:11.5093674258,46.5585048222:11.523790723,46.5585048222:11.5093674258,0.000000\0''
>> @0x000008d=141     :    <JPEG_APP0> 0xffe0 length 16, 'JFIF'
>> @0x0000096=150     :      Version       = 1.1
>> @0x0000098=152     :      Units         = 'dots/inch'
>> @0x0000099=153     :      Xdensity      = 96
>> @0x000009b=155     :      Ydensity      = 96
>> @0x000009d=157     :      XThumbnail    = 0
>> @0x000009e=158     :      YThumbnail    = 0
>> @0x000009e=158     :    </JPEG_APP0>
>> @0x000009f=159     :    <JPEG_DQT> length 67
>> @0x00000e4=228     :    <JPEG_DQT> length 67
>> @0x0000129=297     :    <JPEG_SOF_0> length 17, 8 bits/sample,
>> components=3, width=1608, height=901
>> @0x000013c=316     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 31 table class = 0 table id = 0
>> @0x000015d=349     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 181 table class = 0 table id = 1
>> @0x0000214=532     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 31 table class = 1 table id = 0
>> @0x0000235=565     :    <JPEG_DHT> length 181 table class = 1 table id = 1
>> @0x00002ec=748     :    <JPEG_SOS> length 12  start of JPEG data, 3
>> components 1448808 pixels
>> @0x006b1a4=438692  :  <JPEG_EOI> JPEG length 438694
>>
>> So I think this (JPEG_COM) is not an exif tag as I had been told. I am
>> guessing this is reflected by the library's ComSegment class, but I
>> could not find any documentation or testcase which would tell me what
>> it is and how to rewrite/update it.
>>
>> Any help is most appreciated,
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> CheersBruno
>>>
>>>
>>>       From: andrea antonello <[email protected]>
>>>  To: Commons Users List <[email protected]>
>>>  Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2018 1:56 AM
>>>  Subject: [imaging] Comment tag problem
>>>
>>> Hi, I need some help to find the right tag to use to recreate a tag in a
>>> jpeg file.
>>>
>>> Here is the output of the info given by ImageMagick:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The tag I need should be under "Properties"
>>> and be named: comment
>>>
>>> I have tried to use user_comment and xpcomment, but they produce something
>>> different, like:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can anyone tell me which tag I can use to generate the "comment" tag?
>>>
>>> Thanks for any hint,
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to