On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:50 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Given this inconsistency, and the fact that there are XML documents "in the
> > wild" that use these encoding names, would it be reasonable to relax the 
> > regex
> > just enough so that it'll work with these other names and aliases?
>
> I would say yes.
>
> I'm currently working on a test to check that all charsets *and
> aliases* can be matched, and on a fix to the RE.

Excellent! Thank you!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to