On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 22:17, Laurence Gonsalves <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:50 PM sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Given this inconsistency, and the fact that there are XML documents "in > > > the > > > wild" that use these encoding names, would it be reasonable to relax the > > > regex > > > just enough so that it'll work with these other names and aliases? > > > > I would say yes. > > > > I'm currently working on a test to check that all charsets *and > > aliases* can be matched, and on a fix to the RE.
Test and fix have been committed. > Excellent! Thank you! Thank you for raising the issue. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
