On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <d...@jsonified.com> wrote:

> On 14. November 2013 at 20:45:55, Ryan Mohr (r...@kumu.io) wrote:
> >
> > The show/list thread (posted by thomas.b...@ptb.de) recently
> > sparked an
> > interesting debate. Like Joan, I too feel that CouchDB tries
> > to handle way
> > more than it should. (Caveat -- I actually take this stance to
> > the extreme
> > believing that the couchapp behavior and utilities like futon/fauxton
> > shouldn't be included in the core installation.)
> >
> > IMO the show/list behavior is an application concern, not a database
> > concern, and should be handled by the application server or client.
> > If you
> > think of CouchDB as your database and your application server
> > the line
> > quickly gets blurry.
> >
> > I'm curious, where does the dev team draw the line on couchdb's
> > responsibilities? The fact that it's already an api+database+services
> > suggests there won't be any concrete boundaries. All must be
> > by design.
> >
> >
> > Some related articles:
> > http://insideintercom.io/product-strategy-means-saying-no/
> > http://zurb.com/article/744/steve-jobs-innovation-is-saying-no-to-1-0
>
> Good links.
>
> Personally, I like the idea of a lean core, comprising k/v b-tree store on
> disk + replication. And pretty much everything else as plugin/extensions.
>
> For me, CouchDB is JSON docs + attachments, with streaming HTTP API for
> docs, attachments, views/db, changes, security authorisation  +
> replication. I think the rest could be taken out — plugins, incl show/list
> and authentication.
>
> Well I am not sure you want a documented oriented database then ;) Imo you
are thinking to an object database :)


> CouchApps are a unique feature but in principle can be added to any db
> that supports HTTP, arbitrary binary blobs & mime content type. It’s just
> that with couch’s other features its just so yummy. I still love the fact
> that the whole iriscouch website is a single couchdb document. That’s
> awesome.
>

lists/shows ! couchapps again. If the doc says that it should be fixed ASAP.

>
> Maybe an appropriate objective for the project post merge completion?
>
> A+
> Dave
>
>

Reply via email to