Hi Martin I can't talk from a Drill development standpoint, but Drill depends a lot on Apache Calcite for the JDBC side of stuff, and in Saiku (external non apache project) we've been using Calcite without any major issues against Mondrian 4. I tested Saiku over Drill a few weeks ago and it worked well I can't see any obvious issues in day to day testing, of course that doesn't count as unit testing but it connects and queries fine. It also helps that Julian wrote Mondrian and Calcite ;)
Tom On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Martin Senne <martin.se...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > first, a few general questions: > > - Can you recommend using Mondrian with Drill in general? > - How about maturity and stability? > - What has been tested under which scenario? > > I can across the Drill-Test Framework ( > > https://github.com/mapr/drill-test-framework/tree/master/framework/resources/Advanced/mondrian > ) and the Mondrian tests. Is this the "recommended" test suite to test > Mondrian with Drill? > > < > https://github.com/mapr/drill-test-framework/tree/master/framework/resources/Advanced/mondrian > > > > A few further questions according the test framework: > > - How have the test queries been generated? > - Is there any relationship to the Mondrian tests in > https://github.com/pentaho/mondrian/tree/master/testsrc ? > - How is the status of the tests in the test framework? > - Is it reasonable to execute the queries against Drill that is > configured to access a PostgreSQL (equipped with the foodmart database) > via > the JDBC Storage Plugin ? > > Many thanks in advance > Martin >
