Well, Unfortunately I have toi keep ALL facts in memory (At
least for now...)
Good to know about "from" feature. It will save a lot of
assertions.
Anyway, I think bringing this situation (Huge amount
assertions) to discussion is important once we can always find ways to improve
drools and software that uses drools.
I am currently trying out the drools trunk , but having
problems with ShadowFacts creation...Once they are solved, I believe we went one
step further, and I will let you know.
From: Michael Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de novembro de 2006 11:04
To: user@drools.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [drools-user] Some thoughts about drools
If you don't need to keep ALL the facts in WM at once, then it will make things much much easier.
In 3.2, we will have a "from" feature, which means you could keep some of the data external, and only pull it in (via a query) when needed (which is what databases excel at), and keep the asserted dataset much smaller.
On 11/10/06, 张茂森
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi All:
After I have read the drools user guide, and now my work is about log processing. I want to know whether rule engine is proper to be used to do log processing.
1 Log can be a very large "fact" set (even tera-bytes is possible). Could Rule Engine achieve the requirement of performance?
2 As far as I know, I must wrap each log into object then send it to workmemory of Rule Engine, Does it need? Could I have some more lightweight solution?
Any suggestion would be appreciated
Thank you!
