@vinay - Window operators store everything in the state backend.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:34 PM, vinay patil <vinay18.pa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am not sure about that, I will run the pipeline on cluster and share the
> details
> Since window is a stateful operator , it will store only the key part in
> the state backend and not the value , right ?
>
> Regards,
> Vinay Patil
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Stephan Ewen [via Apache Flink User
> Mailing List archive.] <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9182&i=0>> wrote:
>
>> @vinay - Is it in your case large state that causes slower checkpoints?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:17 PM, vinay patil <[hidden email]
>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9181&i=0>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am also facing this issue, in my case the data is flowing continuously
>>> from the Kafka source, when I increase the checkpoint interval to 60000,
>>> the data gets written to S3 sink.
>>>
>>> Is it because some operator is taking more time for processing, like in
>>> my case I am using a time window of 1sec.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Vinay Patil
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Chakravarthy varaga [via Apache Flink
>>> User Mailing List archive.] <[hidden email]
>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9179&i=0>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>
>>>>     Please find my responses below.
>>>>
>>>>     - What source are you using for the slow input?
>>>> *     [CVP] - Both stream as pointed out in my first mail, are Kafka
>>>> Streams*
>>>>   - How large is the state that you are checkpointing?
>>>>
>>>> *[CVP] - I have enabled checkpointing on the StreamEnvironment as
>>>> below.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *         final StreamExecutionEnvironment streamEnv =
>>>> StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
>>>> streamEnv.setStateBackend(new
>>>> FsStateBackend("file:///tmp/flink/checkpoints"));
>>>> streamEnv.enableCheckpointing(10000);*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *      In terms of the state stored, the KS1 stream has payload of 100K
>>>> events/second, while KS2 have about 1 event / 10 minutes... basically the
>>>> operators perform flatmaps on 8 fields of tuple (all fields are
>>>> primitives). If you look at the states' sizes in dashboard they are in
>>>> Kb...*
>>>>   - Can you try to see in the log if actually the state snapshot takes
>>>> that long, or if it simply takes long for the checkpoint barriers to
>>>> travel through the stream due to a lot of backpressure?
>>>>     [CVP] -There are no back pressure atleast from the sample
>>>> computation in the flink dashboard. 100K/second is low load for flink's
>>>> benchmarks. I could not quite get the barriers vs snapshot state. I have
>>>> attached the Task Manager log (DEBUG) info if that will interest you.
>>>>
>>>>      I have attached the checkpoints times' as .png from the dashboard.
>>>> Basically if you look at checkpoint IDs 28 & 29 &30- you'd see that
>>>> the checkpoints take more than a minute in each case. Before these
>>>> checkpoints, the KS2 stream did not have any events. As soon as an
>>>> event(should be in bytes) was generated, the checkpoints went slow and
>>>> subsequently a minute more for every checkpoint thereafter.
>>>>
>>>>    This log was collected from the standalone flink cluster with 1 job
>>>> manager & 2 TMs. 1 TM was running this application with checkpointing
>>>> (parallelism=1)
>>>>
>>>>     Please let me know if you need further info.,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]
>>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9176&i=0>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's try to figure that one out. Can you give us a bit more
>>>>> information?
>>>>>
>>>>>   - What source are you using for the slow input?
>>>>>   - How large is the state that you are checkpointing?
>>>>>   - Can you try to see in the log if actually the state snapshot takes
>>>>> that long, or if it simply takes long for the checkpoint barriers to 
>>>>> travel
>>>>> through the stream due to a lot of backpressure?
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> Stephan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Fabian Hueske <[hidden email]
>>>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9176&i=1>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi CVP,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not so much familiar with the internals of the checkpointing
>>>>>> system, but maybe Stephan (in CC) has an idea what's going on here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best, Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-09-23 11:33 GMT+02:00 Chakravarthy varaga <[hidden email]
>>>>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9176&i=2>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Aljoscha & Fabian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     I have a stream application that has 2 stream source as below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      KeyedStream<String, String> *ks1* = ds1.keyBy("*") ;
>>>>>>>      KeyedStream<Tuple2<String, V>, String> *ks2* =
>>>>>>> ds2.flatMap(split T into k-v pairs).keyBy(0);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      ks1.connect(ks2).flatMap(X);
>>>>>>>      //X is a CoFlatMapFunction that inserts and removes elements
>>>>>>> from ks2 into a key-value state member. Elements from ks1 are matched
>>>>>>> against that state. the CoFlatMapFunction operator maintains
>>>>>>> ValueState<Tuple2<Long, Long>>;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      //ks1 is streaming about 100K events/sec from kafka topic
>>>>>>>      //ks2 is streaming about 1 event every 10 minutes... Precisely
>>>>>>> when the 1st event is consumed from this stream, checkpoint takes 2 
>>>>>>> minutes
>>>>>>> straight away.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     The version of flink is 1.1.2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried to use checkpoint every 10 Secs using a FsStateBackend...
>>>>>>> What I notice is that the checkpoint duration is almost 2 minutes for 
>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>> cases, while for the other cases it varies from 100 ms to 1.5 minutes
>>>>>>> frequently. I'm attaching the snapshot of the dashboard for your 
>>>>>>> reference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Is this an issue with flink checkpointing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Best Regards
>>>>>>> CVP
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *flink_job_Plan.png* (42K) Download Attachment
>>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/attachment/9176/0/flink_job_Plan.png>
>>>> *Flink-Checkpoint-Times.png* (65K) Download Attachment
>>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/attachment/9176/1/Flink-Checkpoint-Times.png>
>>>> *flink-qchavar-taskmanager-1-elxa1h67k32.log* (442K) Download
>>>> Attachment
>>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/attachment/9176/2/flink-qchavar-taskmanager-1-elxa1h67k32.log>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>>> discussion below:
>>>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nab
>>>> ble.com/Flink-Checkpoint-runs-slow-for-low-load-stream-tp9147p9176.html
>>>> To start a new topic under Apache Flink User Mailing List archive.,
>>>> email [hidden email]
>>>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9179&i=1>
>>>> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink User Mailing List archive., click here
>>>> .
>>>> NAML
>>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> View this message in context: Re: Flink Checkpoint runs slow for low
>>> load stream
>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flink-Checkpoint-runs-slow-for-low-load-stream-tp9147p9179.html>
>>> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list
>>> archive
>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/>
>>> at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
>> below:
>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.
>> nabble.com/Flink-Checkpoint-runs-slow-for-low-load-stream-
>> tp9147p9181.html
>> To start a new topic under Apache Flink User Mailing List archive., email 
>> [hidden
>> email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=9182&i=1>
>> To unsubscribe from Apache Flink User Mailing List archive., click here.
>> NAML
>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: Flink Checkpoint runs slow for low load
> stream
> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flink-Checkpoint-runs-slow-for-low-load-stream-tp9147p9182.html>
> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive
> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/> at
> Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to