Thank you Till :)

Gy

Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec. 5., Sze,
16:20):

> Hi Gyula and Jeff,
>
> I think at the moment it is not possible to define a port range for the
> REST client. Maybe we should add something similar to the
> RestOptions#BIND_ADDRESS, namely introducing a RestOptions#BIND_PORT which
> can define a port range for the binding port. RestOptions#PORT will only be
> considered on the client side to learn where to connect to. I've created a
> corresponding JIRA issue to add this feature [1].
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11081
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe the problem is here? cc Till
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/44ed5ef0fc1c221f3916ab5126f1bc8ee5dfb45d/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/entrypoint/YarnEntrypointUtils.java#L83
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/44ed5ef0fc1c221f3916ab5126f1bc8ee5dfb45d/flink-yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/entrypoint/YarnEntrypointUtils.java#L101
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec. 5., Sze,
>> 13:13):
>>
>>> This requirement makes sense to me. Another issue I hit due to single
>>> value of rest port is that user can not start 2 local MiniCluster, I try to
>>> start 2 flink scala-shell in local mode, but fails due to port conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 于2018年12月5日周三 下午8:04写道:
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>> Is there any way currently to set a port range for the rest client?
>>>> rest.port only takes a single number and it is anyways overwritten to 0.
>>>>
>>>> This seems to be necessary when running the flink client from behind a
>>>> firewall where only a predefined port-range is accessible from the outside.
>>>>
>>>> I would assume this is a common setup in prod environments. This hasn't
>>>> been a problem with the legacy execution mode.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>> Gyula
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Jeff Zhang
>>>
>>

Reply via email to