+1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2 Best, Congxian
Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> 于2020年2月24日周一 下午4:00写道： > +1 for dropping > > Best, > > Dawid > On 24/02/2020 08:22, Yu Li wrote: > > +1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 22:05, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hey Stephan, >> >> +1. >> >> Reading over the linked ticket and your description here, I think it >> makes a lot of sense to go ahead with this. Since it's possible to upgrade >> via intermediate Flink releases as a fail-safe I don't have any concerns. >> >> – Ufuk >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:34 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Till >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thank you for the feedback. >> >> >> >> Here is the JIRA issue with some more explanation also about the >> background and implications: >> >> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16192 >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Stephan >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:26 PM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 for dropping Savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2 >> >>> >> >>> Flink 1.2 is quite far away from the latest 1.10. Especially after >> the release of Flink 1.9 and 1.10, the code and architecture have undergone >> major changes. >> >>> >> >>> Currently, I am updating state migration tests for Flink 1.10. I can >> still see some binary snapshot files of version 1.2. If we agree on this >> topic, we may be able to alleviate some of the burdens(remove those binary >> files) when the migration tests would be updated later. >> >>> >> >>> Best, >> >>> Vino >> >>> >> >>> Theo Diefenthal <theo.diefent...@scoop-software.de> 于2020年2月20日周四 >> 下午9:04写道： >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 for dropping compatibility. >> >>>> >> >>>> I personally think that it is very important for a project to keep a >> good pace in developing that old legacy stuff must be dropped from time to >> time. As long as there is an upgrade routine (via going to another flink >> release) that's fine. >> >>>> >> >>>> ________________________________ >> >>>> Von: "Stephan Ewen" <se...@apache.org> >> >>>> An: "dev" <d...@flink.apache.org>, "user" <user@flink.apache.org> >> >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2020 11:11:43 >> >>>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] Drop Savepoint Compatibility with Flink 1.2 >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi all! >> >>>> For some cleanup and simplifications, it would be helpful to drop >> Savepoint compatibility with Flink version 1.2. That version was released >> almost three years ago. >> >>>> >> >>>> I would expect that no one uses that old version any more in a way >> that they actively want to upgrade directly to 1.11. >> >>>> >> >>>> Even if, there is still the way to first upgrade to another version >> (like 1.9) and then upgrade to 1.11 from there. >> >>>> >> >>>> Any concerns to drop that support? >> >>>> >> >>>> Best, >> >>>> Stephan >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> SCOOP Software GmbH - Gut Maarhausen - Eiler Straße 3 P - D-51107 >> Köln >> >>>> Theo Diefenthal >> >>>> >> >>>> T +49 221 801916-196 - F +49 221 801916-17 - M +49 160 90506575 >> >>>> theo.diefent...@scoop-software.de - www.scoop-software.de >> >>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln, Handelsregister: Köln, >> >>>> Handelsregisternummer: HRB 36625 >> >>>> Geschäftsführung: Dr. Oleg Balovnev, Frank Heinen, >> >>>> Martin Müller-Rohde, Dr. Wolfgang Reddig, Roland Scheel >> >>>
