Hi Hangxiang, but, if I understand correctly, setting restore mode to CLAIM means that the job might create a new incremental checkpoint based on the savepoint, right? And if the operator then decides to clean up the savepoint, the checkpoint would be corrupted, no?
Regards, Alexis. Am Mo., 28. Nov. 2022 um 05:17 Uhr schrieb Hangxiang Yu <master...@gmail.com >: > Hi, Alexis. > IIUC, There is no conflict between savepoint history and restore mode. > Restore mode cares about whether/how we manage the savepoint of old job. > Savepoint management in operator only cares about savepoint history of new > job. > In other words, savepoint cleanup should not clean the savepoint from the > old job which should only be controlled by restore mode. > So I think you could also set restore mode according to your needs. > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:41 PM Alexis Sarda-Espinosa < > sarda.espin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is there a recommended configuration for the restore mode of jobs managed >> by the operator? >> >> Since the documentation states that the operator keeps a savepoint >> history to perform cleanup, I imagine restore mode should always be >> NO_CLAIM, but I just want to confirm. >> >> Regards, >> Alexis. >> > > > -- > Best, > Hangxiang. >
