On 9/27/07, dbrenck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > prasad wrote: > > > > The schemas are here > > http://geronimo.apache.org/xml-schemas.html > > > > Please bear with us while we fix this and other samples and move the code > > to svn. > > > > Cheers Prasad > > > > As I'm no native english speaker, I'm not really sure about how to > "interpret" "please bear with us...". > Your replies do perfectly help me, so I'm absolutely happy :-)
You may interpret "please bear with us" as "sorry about the glitches in the sample. Please tolerate this till we fix this soon." I am not a native English speaker either. So please bear with my writing :-) > > Besides I checked your schema link: > > http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v20-xml-schemas.html > > The first table says: > > Module Type | Geronimo Schema | Preferred Java EE Schema > EJB (JAR) |http:/.../openejb-jar-2.1 | ejb-jar_3_0.xsd > > Does this mean 'geronimo' can operate on an 'ejb-jar 3.0' descriptor instead > of an 'openejb-jar-2.1'? Try to understand it this way. Your ejb-jar.xml may conform to the latest ejb-jar-3.0.xsd while your openejb-jar.xml may better conform to the openejb-jar-21.xsd. The former is the javaee5 descriptor while the latter is the OpenEJB specific descriptor. > > ... just like I mentioned before: sorry if my questions are nooby ;-) No, they are fine. We are all constantly learning here. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/maven---geronimo-2.0-example-build-problem-tf4496318s134.html#a12917468 > Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
