Yes, the failures around Accumulo in hadoop_2 profile are expected and nothing to worry about. I should've probably mentioned it in my RC announcement email. Sorry about that.
Any failures in hadoop_1 profile would be a reason to reconsider RC0. Thanks, Roman. P.S. This is one of the reasons we're still running with hadoop_1 as a default profile. On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Akila Wajirasena <akila.wajiras...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Roman, > > I got the same error when running hadoop_2 profile. > According to this [1] the Accumulo version we use in giraph (1.4) is not > compatible with Hadoop 2. > I think this is the issue. > > [1] > http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Accumulo-Hadoop-version-compatibility-matrix-tp3893p3894.html > > Thanks > > Akila > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Toshio ITO <toshio9....@toshiba.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi Roman. >> >> I checked out release-1.1.0-RC0 and succeeded to build it. >> >> $ git checkout release-1.1.0-RC0 >> $ mvn clean >> $ mvn package -Phadoop_2 -DskipTests >> ## SUCCESS >> >> However, when I ran the tests with LocalJobRunner, it failed. >> >> $ mvn clean >> $ mvn package -Phadoop_2 >> >> It passed tests from "Core" and "Examples", but it failed at >> "Accumulo I/O". >> >> >> testAccumuloInputOutput(org.apache.giraph.io.accumulo.TestAccumuloVertexFormat) >> >> The error log contained the following exception >> >> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found interface >> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.JobContext, but class was expected >> >> >> Next I wanted to run the tests with a running Hadoop2 instance, but >> I'm having trouble to set it up (I'm quite new to Hadoop). >> >> Could you show me some example configuration (etc/hadoop/* files) of >> Hadoop 2.2.0 single-node cluster? That would be very helpful. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Toshio ITO <toshio9....@toshiba.co.jp> >> > wrote: >> > > Hi Roman. >> > > >> > > Thanks for the reply. >> > > >> > > OK, I'll try hadoop_1 and hadoop_2 with the latest >> > > release-1.1.0-RC0 and report the result. >> > >> > That would be extremely helpful! >> > >> > And speaking of which -- I'd like to remind folks >> > that taking RC0 for a spin would really help >> > at this point. If we ever want to have 1.1.0 out >> > we need the required PMC votes. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Roman. >> ------------------------------------ >> Toshio Ito > > > > > > >
