Hi Henry, These signatures are auto generated by maven sign plugin and I am not too keen on them being present in the staging repos. There is however, very little I can do about them as they are pushed to the staging repos and I cannot intervene in that process. hth Lewis
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Lewis, > > Thanks so much for driving the release. > > Looks like the signatures are generated also for the hash files. I am > seeing > > gora-cassandra-0.4-sources.jar.asc.asc > gora-cassandra-0.4-sources.jar.asc.asc.md5 > gora-cassandra-0.4-sources.jar.asc.asc.sha1 > > and also somehow the signature file has accompanying hash files: > > gora-cassandra-0.4-sources.jar.asc.md5 > gora-cassandra-0.4-sources.jar.asc.sha1 > > Extra files generated I suppose? > > - Henry > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney > <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > I am really glad to be opening a VOTE to draw a line under the 0.4 > > development drive and to release the 0.4 artifacts. > > We solved a whole bunch of issues: http://s.apache.org/4lx > > > > SVN source tag (r1588038): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gora/tags/apache-gora-0.4/ > > > > Staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegora-1000/ > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gora/trunk/KEYS > > > > Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ > > > > A note on VOTE'ing. > > > > 1. The code you are VOTE'ing to release is the SVN source tag > r1588038. > > 2. The staging repos publishes the container artifacts are consumable > > Maven artifacts on Maven central. > > 3. Finally, the release artifacts are hosted on the Apache > distribution > > server and cloned by mirror servers. > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. Again I would like to thank everyone that > > contributed to Gora. here's to plenty more releases. > > Best > > Lewis > > > > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! > > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... > > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > -- *Lewis*
