Luke, On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 09:05 +0000, Luke Daley wrote: > Peter is right.
Under normal circumstances yes, but... > This is a classic case of where the previous dynamic property behaviour is > problematic. I am not entirely sure the ext.???? was the best way forward, but it'll do. > The GroovyDoc task simply does not have those options, so setting them has no > effect. The documentation says it does, well most of them anyway, there are some that seem to be from a previous eon. Also I observe that the Groovydoc does reflect the data and not the default, hence by ", but..." earlier. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
