Am pretty sure we do not maintain AMIs here at Apache Hadoop at least.
Perhaps those are from some earlier effort by AMZN itself? There is
this page that may interest you though?:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AmazonEC2.

Sorry for the short responses - I'm not well versed with these things.
Someone else can probably assist you further.


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Keith Wiley <kwi...@keithwiley.com> wrote:
>
> I'll look into the job.xml issue, thanks for the suggestion.  In the 
> meantime, who is in charge of maintaining the "official" AWS Hadoop AMIs?  
> The following are the contents of the hadoop-images/ S3 bucket.  As you can 
> see, it tops out at 19:
>
> IMAGE   ami-65987c0c    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.17.1-i386.manifest.xml   
> 914733919441    available       public          i386    machine aki-a71cf9ce  
>   ari-a51cf9cc            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-4b987c22    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.17.1-x86_64.manifest.xml 
> 914733919441    available       public          x86_64  machine aki-b51cf9dc  
>   ari-b31cf9da            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-b0fe1ad9    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.18.0-i386.manifest.xml   
> 914733919441    available       public          i386    machine aki-a71cf9ce  
>   ari-a51cf9cc            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-90fe1af9    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.18.0-x86_64.manifest.xml 
> 914733919441    available       public          x86_64  machine aki-b51cf9dc  
>   ari-b31cf9da            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-ea36d283    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.18.1-i386.manifest.xml   
> 914733919441    available       public          i386    machine aki-a71cf9ce  
>   ari-a51cf9cc            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-fe37d397    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.18.1-x86_64.manifest.xml 
> 914733919441    available       public          x86_64  machine aki-b51cf9dc  
>   ari-b31cf9da            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-fa6a8e93    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.19.0-i386.manifest.xml   
> 914733919441    available       public          i386    machine aki-a71cf9ce  
>   ari-a51cf9cc            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-cd6a8ea4    hadoop-images/hadoop-0.19.0-x86_64.manifest.xml 
> 914733919441    available       public          x86_64  machine aki-b51cf9dc  
>   ari-b31cf9da            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-15e80f7c    hadoop-images/hadoop-base-20090210-i386.manifest.xml  
>   914733919441    available       public          i386    machine 
> aki-a71cf9ce    ari-a51cf9cc            instance-store  paravirtual     xen
> IMAGE   ami-1ee80f77    
> hadoop-images/hadoop-base-20090210-x86_64.manifest.xml  914733919441    
> available       public          x86_64  machine aki-b51cf9dc    ari-b31cf9da  
>           instance-store  paravirtual     xen
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 15:02 , Harsh J wrote:
>
> > 0.19 is really old and thats probably why the Text utility (fs -text)
> > doesn't support automatic decompression based on extensions (or
> > specifically, of .deflate).
> >
> > Did the job.xml of the job that produced this output also carry
> > mapred.output.compress=false in it? The file should be viewable on the
> > JT UI page for the job. Unless explicitly turned out, even 0.19
> > wouldn't have enabled compression on its own.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Keith Wiley <kwi...@keithwiley.com> wrote:
> >> I just got hadoop running on EC2 (0.19 just because that's the AMI the 
> >> scripts seemed to go for).  The PI example worked and I believe the 
> >> wordcount example worked too.  However, the output file is in .deflate 
> >> format.  "hadoop fs -text" fails to decompress the file -- it produces the 
> >> same binary output as "hadoop fs -cat", which I find counterintuitive; 
> >> isn't -text specifically supposed to handle this situation?
> >>
> >> I copied the file to local and tried manually decompressing it with gunzip 
> >> and lzop (by appending appropriate suffixes), but both tools failed to 
> >> recognize the file.  To add to the confusion, I see this in the default 
> >> configuration offered by the EC2 scripts:
> >>
> >>  <name>mapred.output.compress</name>
> >>  <value>false</value>
> >>  <description>Should the job outputs be compressed?
> >>  </description>
> >>
> >> ...so I don't understand why the output was compressed in the first place.
> >>
> >> At this point, I'm kind of stuck.  The output shouldn't be compressed to 
> >> begin with, and all attempts to decompress it have failed.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> Keith Wiley     kwi...@keithwiley.com     keithwiley.com    
> music.keithwiley.com
>
> "I used to be with it, but then they changed what it was.  Now, what I'm with
> isn't it, and what's it seems weird and scary to me."
>                                            --  Abe (Grandpa) Simpson
> ________________________________________________________________________________
>



--
Harsh J

Reply via email to