For MapReduce and YARN, we recently published a couple blog posts on
migrating:
http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2013/11/migrating-to-mapreduce-2-on-yarn-for-users/
http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2013/11/migrating-to-mapreduce-2-on-yarn-for-operators/

hope that helps,
Sandy


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Nirmal Kumar <nirmal.ku...@impetus.co.in>wrote:

>  Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am also looking into migrating\upgrading from Apache Hadoop 1.x to
> Apache Hadoop 2.x.
>
> I didn’t find any doc\guide\blogs for the same.
>
> Although there are guides\docs for the CDH and HDP migration\upgradation
> from Hadoop 1.x to Hadoop 2.x
>
> Would referring those be of some use?
>
>
>
> I am looking for similar guides\docs for Apache Hadoop 1.x to Apache
> Hadoop 2.x.
>
>
>
> I found something on slideshare though. Not sure how much useful that is
> going to be. I still need to verify that.
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/mikejf12/an-example-apache-hadoop-yarn-upgrade
>
>
>
> Any suggestions\comments will be of great help.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Nirmal
>
>
>
> *From:* Jilal Oussama [mailto:jilal.ouss...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 08, 2013 9:13 PM
> *To:* user@hadoop.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Any reference for upgrade hadoop from 1.x to 2.2
>
>
>
> I am looking for the same thing if anyone can point us to a good direction
> please.
>
> Thank you.
>
> (Currently running Hadoop 1.2.1)
>
>
>
> 2013/11/1 YouPeng Yang <yypvsxf19870...@gmail.com>
>
>   Hi users
>
>    Are there any reference docs to introduce how to upgrade hadoop from
> 1.x to 2.2.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential,
> proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is
> intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please
> destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when
> received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee,
> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the
> communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
>

Reply via email to