Krishna,

Well, it all depends on your use case. In the case of Llama, Llama is a
server that hosts multiple unmanaged AMs, thus all AMs run in the same
process.

Thanks.


On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Krishna Kishore Bonagiri <
write2kish...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alejandro,
>
>   I don't start all the AMs from the same JVM. How can I do that? Also,
> when I do that, that will save me time taken to get AM started, which is
> also good to see an improvement in. Please let me know how can I do that?
> And, would this also save me time taken for connecting from AM to the
> Resource Manager?
>
> Thanks,
> Kishore
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Krishna,
>>
>> Are you starting all AMs from the same JVM? Mind sharing the code you are
>> using for your time testing?
>>
>> Thx
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Krishna Kishore Bonagiri <
>> write2kish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alejandro,
>>>
>>>  I have modified the code in
>>>
>>>
>>> hadoop-2.2.0-src/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-applications/hadoop-yarn-applications-unmanaged-am-launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/applications/unmanagedamlauncher/UnmanagedAMLauncher.java
>>>
>>> to submit multiple application masters one after another and still
>>> seeing 800 to 900 ms being taken for the start() call on
>>> AMRMClientAsync in all of those applications.
>>>
>>> Please suggest if you think I am missing something else
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kishore
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Krishna Kishore Bonagiri <
>>> write2kish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alejandro,
>>>>
>>>>   I don't know what are managed and unmanaged AMs, can you please
>>>> explain me what are the difference and how are each of them launched?
>>>>
>>>>  I tried to google for these terms and came
>>>> across hadoop-yarn-applications-unmanaged-am-launcher-2.2.0.jar, is it
>>>> related to that?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kishore
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kishore,
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, please specify if you are using managed or unmanaged AMs (the
>>>>> numbers I've mentioned before are using unmanaged AMs).
>>>>>
>>>>> thx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>> vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is just creating a connection to RM and shouldn't take that long.
>>>>>> Can you please file a ticket so that we can look at it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JVM class loading overhead is one possibility but 1 sec is a bit too
>>>>>> much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Krishna Kishore Bonagiri wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>   I am seeing the following call to start() on AMRMClientAsync taking
>>>>>> from 0.9 to 1 second. Why does it take that long? Is there a way to 
>>>>>> reduce
>>>>>> it, I mean does it depend on any of the interval parameters or so in
>>>>>> configuration files? I have tried reducing the value of the first 
>>>>>> argument
>>>>>> below from 1000 to 100 seconds also, but that doesn't help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     AMRMClientAsync.CallbackHandler allocListener = new
>>>>>> RMCallbackHandler();
>>>>>>     amRMClient = AMRMClientAsync.createAMRMClientAsync(1000,
>>>>>> allocListener);
>>>>>>     amRMClient.init(conf);
>>>>>>     amRMClient.start();
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Kishore
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>>>>> entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>>>>>> confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
>>>>>> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
>>>>>> hereby
>>>>>> notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution,
>>>>>> disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
>>>>>> you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>>>>> immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alejandro
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alejandro
>>
>
>


-- 
Alejandro

Reply via email to