Awesome, thanks a lot. I will try them out n let u guys know the result.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:54 PM, 陈加俊 <cjjvict...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes I do it like this. But I hava another problem I can't count the rows of > one table fast. > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Weishung: > > For max, you can enumerate the regions for your table. Start the scan > from > > the first row in the last region. > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > For min, you can write your own filter which extends FilterBase so > that > > > the > > > > scan stops after seeing the first row. > > > > > > > > > > Or just start the scan at the a row whose name is the empty byte array > > > and kill the scan after the first return; the first return will be the > > > first row in table. > > > > > > I don't know how to get the last row in a table, easily. > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Best regards > jiajun >