+1.

This question comes up enough on the dist-list it's worth getting some
pointers on record.





On 1/10/13 2:24 PM, "Mohammad Tariq" <donta...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Jack, Leonid,
>
>    I request you guys to please continue the discussion
>through the thread itself if possible for you both. I would
>like to know about Jack's setup. I too find it quite interesting.
>
>Many thanks.
>
>Warm Regards,
>Tariq
>https://mtariq.jux.com/
>
>
>On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Leonid Fedotov
><lfedo...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>
>> Jack,
>> yes, this is very interesting to know your setup details.
>> Could you please provide more information?
>> Or we can take this off the list if you likeŠ
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Leonid Fedotov
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Jack Levin wrote:
>>
>> > We stored about 1 billion images into hbase with file size up to 10MB.
>> > Its been running for close to 2 years without issues and serves
>> > delivery of images for Yfrog and ImageShack.  If you have any
>> > questions about the setup, I would be glad to answer them.
>> >
>> > -Jack
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> I have done extensive testing and have found that blobs don't belong
>>in
>> the
>> >> databases but are rather best left out on the file system. Andrew
>> outlined
>> >> issues that you'll face and not to mention IO issues when compaction
>> occurs
>> >> over large files.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I meant this to say "a few really large values"
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Purtell
>><apurt...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Consider if the split threshold is 2 GB but your one row contains
>>10
>> GB
>> >>> as
>> >>>> really large value.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>>
>> >>>   - Andy
>> >>>
>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>> >>> (via Tom White)
>> >>>
>>
>>


Reply via email to