i) Yes, or, at least, of often yes. II) You're right. It's difficult to guess how much it would improve the performances (there is a lot of caching effect), but using a single scan could be an interesting optimisation imho.
Nicolas On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Varun Sharma <va...@pinterest.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to batched get(s) on a cluster. Here is the code: > > List<Get> gets = ... > // Prepare my gets with the rows i need > myHTable.get(gets); > > I have two questions about the above scenario: > i) Is this the most optimal way to do this ? > ii) I have a feeling that if there are multiple gets in this case, on the > same region, then each one of those shall instantiate separate scan(s) over > the region even though a single scan is sufficient. Am I mistaken here ? > > Thanks > Varun >
