If the scan is happening on the same region then going for Scan would be a better option.
Regards RAm On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkey...@gmail.com> wrote: > i) Yes, or, at least, of often yes. > II) You're right. It's difficult to guess how much it would improve the > performances (there is a lot of caching effect), but using a single scan > could be an interesting optimisation imho. > > Nicolas > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Varun Sharma <va...@pinterest.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to batched get(s) on a cluster. Here is the code: > > > > List<Get> gets = ... > > // Prepare my gets with the rows i need > > myHTable.get(gets); > > > > I have two questions about the above scenario: > > i) Is this the most optimal way to do this ? > > ii) I have a feeling that if there are multiple gets in this case, on the > > same region, then each one of those shall instantiate separate scan(s) > over > > the region even though a single scan is sufficient. Am I mistaken here ? > > > > Thanks > > Varun > > >
