Hi ya Anoop the comparison was between SCVF and Custom Filter. Seeing the deployment process of Custom Filter, i.e building a jar deploying it on to all RS *i thought that the work in similar fashion as that of CP*. If they don't process records parallel on RS why not use HDFS to distribute the jar?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you format the table for better reading ? > You can put picture on third party website and post link here. > > Does your custom filter maintain state ? > > What hbase version are you using ? > > Have you checked region server logs during the 15 minutes ? > > Cheers > > On Jun 16, 2014, at 3:25 AM, Vikram Singh Chandel < > vikramsinghchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi > > I was working on way to find a substitute for coprocessor(because of > > various issue with them) > > so tried Custom Filters and found that the custom filter are much more > > resource exhaustive (CPU) then coprocessor having single column value > > filter. > > > > *Query: Get List of Publications for UDANDA (CF:Attributes Col:Country) - > > Result: 509 Records. * > > > > *Heap 3 Gb * > > > > > > With Custom Filter > > No of Scan Req > > Max Heap(Mb) > > Max CPU(%) > > > > > > > > 1 > > 86.74 > > 7.7 > > 5 > > 412 > > 63.37 > > 10 > > 926 > > 99 > > *With Single Column Value Filter* > > No of Scan Req > > Max Heap > > Max CPU > > > > > > > > 10 > > 453.66 > > 17.7 > > Query ran for 15 minutes didn't get results. Terminated execution > > > > > > > > *Can anyone shed some light on this.* > > -- > > > > *Regards* > > > > *VIKRAM SINGH CHANDEL* > > > > Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary,Reduce. > > Reuse. Recycle. Save our planet. > -- *Regards* *VIKRAM SINGH CHANDEL* Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary,Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. Save our planet.
