Hi Lars, Thanks for bringing this for discussion. From my experience I can tell that 0.94 is very stable but that shouldn't be a blocker to consider to EOL'ing. Are you considering any specific timeframe for that?
thanks, esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote: > > given that CDH4 is hbase 0.94 i dont believe nobody is using it. for our > clients the majority is on 0.94 (versus 0.96 and up). > > so i am going with 1), its very stable! > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Over the past few months the rate of the change into 0.94 has slowed > > significantly. > > 0.94.25 was released on Nov 15th, and since then we had only 4 changes. > > > > This could mean two things: (1) 0.94 is very stable now or (2) nobody is > > using it (at least nobody is contributing to it anymore). > > > > > > If anybody out there is still using 0.94 and is not planning to upgrade > to > > 0.98 or later soon (which will required downtime), please speak up. > > Otherwise it might be time to think about EOL'ing 0.94. > > > > It's not actually much work to do these releases, especially when they > are > > so small, but I'd like to continue only if they are actually used. > > In any case, I am going to spin 0.94.26 with the current 4 fixes today or > > tomorrow. > > > > -- Lars > > >
