Hi Ram,

Unfortunately, that configuration doesn’t seem to help. I’ve pasted my
config followed by the CLI commands I’ve been running so that the issue
can be reproduced.


CONFIG:
<property>
  <name>hbase.security.authentication</name>
  <value>simple</value>
</property>
<property>
  <name>hbase.security.authorization</name>
  <value>true</value>
</property>
<property>
    <name>hbase.security.access.early_out</name>
    <value>false</value>
</property>
<property>
  <name>hbase.coprocessor.master.classes</name>
  
<value>org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.AccessController,org.apache.
hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.VisibilityController</value>
</property>
<property>
  <name>hbase.coprocessor.region.classes</name>
  
<value>org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.AccessController,org.apache.
hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.VisibilityController</value>
</property>
<property>
  <name>hbase.coprocessor.regionserver.classes</name>
  
<value>org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.AccessController,org.apache.
hadoop.hbase.security.visibility.VisibilityController$VisibilityReplication
</value>
</property>



CLI COMMANDS:

Superuser:
create_namespace 'ns1'
create 'ns1:t1','cf1'
grant 'userX','RW','ns1:t1'


userX:
put 'ns1:t1', 'r2', 'cf1:q1', 'v1',1462364682267
put 'ns1:t1', 'r2', 'cf1:q2', 'v2',1462364700012

Superuser:
grant 'ns1:t1', {'userX' => 'R' }, { COLUMNS => 'cf1', FILTER =>
"(PrefixFilter ('r2'))" }

userX:
put 'ns1:t1', 'r2', 'cf1:q1', 'v2',1462364682267 #WORKS, BUT SHOULD IT???



Any help/guidance you can provide will be greatly appreciated.

-- 
Warmest Regards,
Jason Tokayer, PhD



On 5/3/16, 2:30 PM, "ramkrishna vasudevan"
<ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:

>I think reading the code - there should be no change between the version
>that you are using and the trunk version.
>
>Set this property to false
>'hbase.security.access.early_out' and try once.
>Tomorrow early in the morning I will try out some test case and will
>revert
>back to you.
>Do let me know if the above config works for you.
>
>Regards
>Ram
>
>On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Tokayer, Jason M. <
>jason.toka...@capitalone.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ram,
>>
>> We are using 1.1.2, but can update to most recent if the desired feature
>> is provided. We do set authorization to true, and I can confirm that I
>>can
>> block writes to the entire table for user-X. But, it that when I grant
>>RW
>> permission (to user-X) on a table and R only on a specific cell in that
>> table then user-X can still write to that cell. This indicates to me
>>that
>> table/cf ACLs are given preference over cell ACLs.
>>
>> Have there been significant upgrades to this particular feature since
>> v1.1.2? Would you recommend attempting an upgrade, or do you think the
>> issue is still present in trunk? Can you verify via tests that
>> CHECK_CELL_DEFAULT is (a) used by default and (b) is working properly? I
>> don¹t see any unit tests in the codebase for this feature.
>>
>> --
>> Warmest Regards,
>> Jason Tokayer, PhD
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/16, 1:41 PM, "ramkrishna vasudevan"
>> <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Jason
>> >Which version of HBase are you using?
>> >
>> >Atleast in trunk I could see that
>>'OP_ATTRIBUTE_ACL_STRATEGY_CELL_FIRST'
>> >is
>> >not used rather by default CHECK_CELL_DEFAULT strategy is what getting
>> >used
>> >now.
>> >
>> >Ensure that 'hbase.security.authorization' is set to true in
>> >hbase-site.xml. If you could tell the version you are using can be much
>> >more specific.
>> >
>> >Regards
>> >Ram
>> >
>> >On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Tokayer, Jason M. <
>> >jason.toka...@capitalone.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am working on Hbase ACLs in order to lock a particular cell value
>>for
>> >> writes by a user for an indefinite amount of time. This same user
>>will
>> >>be
>> >> writing to Hbase during normal program execution, and he needs to be
>> >>able
>> >> to continue to write to other cells during the single cell lock
>>period.
>> >> I¹ve been experimenting with simple authentication (i.e. No
>>Kerberos),
>> >>and
>> >> the plan is to extend to a Kerberized cluster once I get this
>>working.
>> >>
>> >> First, I am able to grant Œuser-X¹ read and write permissions to a
>> >> particular namespace. In this way user-X can write to any Hbase
>>table in
>> >> that namespace during normal execution. What I need to be able to do
>> >>next
>> >> is to set user-X¹s permissions on a particular cell to read only and
>> >>have
>> >> that take precedence over the table permissions. I found a parameter
>>in
>> >>the
>> >> codebase here
>> >>
>> >>
>> 
>>https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/hbase-client/src/main/java/or
>> >>g/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/access/AccessControlConstants.java,
>> >> namely OP_ATTRIBUTE_ACL_STRATEGY_CELL_FIRST, that seems to allow for
>> >>this
>> >> prioritization of cell-level over table-/column-level. But I cannot
>> >>figure
>> >> out how to set this with key OP_ATTRIBUTE_ACL_STRATEGY. Is it
>>possible
>> >>to
>> >> set the strategy to cell-level prioritization, preferably in
>> >> hbase-site.xml? This feature is critical to our cell-level access
>> >>control.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> *Warmest Regards,*
>> >> *Jason Tokayer, PhD*
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>> >> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
>> >> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
>> >>information
>> >> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or
>> >>entity
>> >> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
>> >>intended
>> >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
>> >> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of
>>any
>> >> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If
>>you
>> >> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>and
>> >> delete the material from your computer.
>> >>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
>> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
>>information
>> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or
>>entity
>> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
>>intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
>> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
>> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
>> delete the material from your computer.
>>
>>

________________________________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to 
Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of 
work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is 
intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying 
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

Reply via email to