Hi Val, First load tests have shown that plain write through is ok in my scenario, so no worries. I'll keep an eye on that ticket however.
Thank you for the info. -- Christian Reiniger -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: vkulichenko [mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 21:00 An: user@ignite.apache.org Betreff: Re: Write Behind data safety guarantees II Hi, In current implementation write-behind store can lose writes even if only one nodes fails. This can be improved by adding backup queues [1], but it's not implemented yet. Of course, this will not help if you lose more nodes than number of backups you have (in this case data in memory is also lost). Only synchronous write-through can guarantee that there are no data loss. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1897 -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Write-Behind-data-safety-guarantees-II-tp7696p7721.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
