Yes, in your case Ignite stores deserialized values as well. You may try to
avoid it by switching copy on read to true, remove indexed types and
disable peer class loading if it's set.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:05 PM, rishi007bansod <rishi007ban...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have used single node. My cache configuration is,
> Cache configuration I have used is,
>
>     CacheConfiguration<Object,Object> ccfg_order_line = new
> CacheConfiguration<>();
>     ccfg_order_line.setIndexedTypes(order_lineKey.class,
> order_line.class);
>     ccfg_order_line.setName("order_line_cache");
>     ccfg_order_line.setCopyOnRead(false);
>     ccfg_order_line.setMemoryMode(CacheMemoryMode.ONHEAP_TIERED);
>     ccfg_order_line.setSwapEnabled(false);
>     ccfg_order_line.setBackups(0);
>     IgniteCache<Object, Object> cache_order_line =
> ignite.createCache(ccfg_order_line);
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/Memory-consumption-in-apache-ignite-tp9035p9044.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to