Hi Val, first of all, let me thank you for this great product and incredible mailing list.
Anonymizing our code will take a bit longer but I can give the following numbers: load time 10M records without indexes 10m2s load time 10M records with a simple row id type index : 12m load time 10M records with a simple row id type index + a composed index (3 columns : Long, Long, String) : 40 minutes The VM's heap is 56Gb, At the end of the processing, it consumes .. GB with a peak of 32Gb. Maximum GC pause is 2s with a pause every 2 minutes. So GC does not sound to be an issue. As for the performance I took 3 snapshots of 5 minutes each. After 2 min : <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n9725/Capture1.png> After 15 min <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n9725/Capture2.png> After 35min <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n9725/Capture3.png> I was also a bit surprised of the use of Lucene internally to H2. <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n9725/Capture4.png> Hope you can make sense of all of this. Thanks and happy holidays -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/LoadCache-Performance-decreases-with-the-size-of-the-cache-tp9645p9725.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
