Hi Andrew,

I did try with the Iterator implementation using iterator.hasNext() (you can
see that its commented in the code i shared) but the performance is only
slightly higher (hence gave the range 10-100 keys per second)

Do you want me to try to use a cursor explicitly instead of using an
iterator.
I need to go through all the keys and perform the computation.


Regards
Anand Vijai



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Reply via email to