Prasad, Parallel updates in a transaction are not possible. As a matter of fact, they happen during commit, so doing actual 'put' invocations won't provide any improvement. Also, you transaction seems to be local, so I don't think you are going to be faster than you are now. However, if processing can be moved outside of transaction without breaking the functionality, you definitely should do that.
In any case, I'm not sure I understand why you need to do this in a single transaction. My recommendation would be to revisit the architecture and try to avoid this kind of locking. -Val -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
