My top priorities:

   - Thin Client API extension: Compute, Continuous Queries, Services
   - .NET Near Cache: soon to come in Thick API, to be investigated for
   Thin Clients
   - .NET Modernization for Ignite 3.0: drop legacy .NET Framework support,
   target .NET Standard 2.0, add nullable annotations to the API


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:23 AM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Denis,
>
> Thank you for sharing the list of top changes. The list looks good.
>
> I wanted to share that efforts regarding IEP-36 is already underway and
> there are also open PRs under review and working through review feedback.
> One of the area that we are focussing is first we will merge changes in
> ignite-extensions repo before removing the specific migrated module from
> ignite repo.
>
> There are also contribution from community on bug fixes in
> ignite-extensions repo as well which we are verifying and merging in
> ignite-extensions repo after running through CI pipeline in teamcity.
>
> I like the focus area on docs and I really like the Apache Ignite Usecases
> page https://ignite.apache.org/provenusecases.html,  I would like to
> suggest if we can add a page like powered by Apache Ignite and list few Org
> who are already using Apache Ignite in prod.
>
> Something similar to this page https://flink.apache.org/poweredby.html
>
> Regards,
> Saikat
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:44 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> My top list of changes is as follows:
>>
>>    - Feature: New lightweight Apache Ignite website with advanced search
>>    engine optimizations and updated technical content. Why? Much better
>>    discoverability of Ignite via search engines like Google to let many more
>>    application developers learn about Ignite existence. This change is to be
>>    brought to live soon:
>>    
>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Ignite-Website-New-Look-td46324.html
>>
>>
>>    - Feature: New Ignite documentation on a new platform and with a new
>>    structure. Why? Ignite documentation has to help new application 
>> developers
>>    to get up and running as quickly as possible, it also has to become a
>>    primary source that answers most of the questions. Our current docs have a
>>    lot of gaps: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7595
>>
>>
>>    - Process Change: to be successful with the point above,
>>    documentation should be created/updated before we close a JIRA ticket for
>>    code/API/feature contribution. Why? First, application developers learn
>>    Ignite and create their Ignite-apps referring to API reference and
>>    technical documentation (and not to the source code), thus, documentation
>>    needs to be treated as an integral part of the whole project. Second, 
>> while
>>    writing a new documentation paragraph we could discover incompleteness of 
>> a
>>    fix/feature or usability issues before the change is released publicly.
>>
>>
>>    - Feature: complete the modularization project by defining the Ignite
>>    core that will be released separately from Ignite extensions. The 'why' is
>>    written here:
>>    
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:21 AM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Ignite community,
>>>
>>> Many of us want to see where Ignite is heading and ask for some sort of
>>> a 2020 course/plan/roadmap and a predictable schedule of major releases.
>>> Also, there are intentions to enhance some internal processes and
>>> collaboration approaches.
>>>
>>> Let's start moving in that direction by defining 3-5 major changes you
>>> would like to contribute this year personally or will be glad to drive
>>> (like processes changes) and work together with someone else. Dear, Ignite
>>> user community, please share your suggestions as well.
>>>
>>> Note, let's use this thread to collect major
>>> topics/directions/features/changes. Just respond with your proposals. Don't
>>> go into arguments if you don't agree with someone's opinions. Once the
>>> topics are collected, we'll create a wiki page and, most likely, will start
>>> working through specific items in focus groups and only then lay out a
>>> cohesive plan with some dates.
>>>
>>> -
>>> Denis
>>>
>>

Reply via email to