Vladimir, > I do not use SQL because my interest is to get max performance, I use key-value API instead > The same reason is why I use Java
I don't think we should downplay SQL and C# APIs like this - it can be misleading to our users. SQL can be faster than key-val API (e.g. index lookups), and C# API is on par with Java (thin client is a bit faster, AFAIR). On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:11 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote: > > are there C# equivalencies to the Java interfaces BinaryObject and > Affinity > > Yes, please see IIgnite.GetAffinity [1] and GetBinary [2]. > > [1] > https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/dotnetdoc/api/Apache.Ignite.Core.IIgnite.html#Apache_Ignite_Core_IIgnite_GetAffinity_System_String_ > [2] > https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/dotnetdoc/api/Apache.Ignite.Core.IIgnite.html#Apache_Ignite_Core_IIgnite_GetBinary > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:55 AM <vtcher...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do not use SQL because my interest is to get max performance, I use >> key-value API instead. The same reason is why I use Java - it is native for >> Ignite. I think there should be wrappers forBinaryObject and Affinity in c#. >> >> Vladimir >> >> 4:39, 3 декабря 2020 г., adumalagan <andreadumala...@gmail.com>: >> >> I see, thanks for the clarification! >> >> I also have another question - are there C# equivalencies to the Java >> interfaces BinaryObject and Affinity? >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Отправлено из мобильного приложения Яндекс.Почты >> >
