What about Ignite 2? It is great for KV scenarios, and the Java client is first-class.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 6:51 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ignite 3 is in alpha stage, it is way too early to do any benchmarks. > We are aware of existing performance issues, those will be fixed. Right > now the focus is on correctness and features. > > > Are there any plans for Ignite 3 to have more low level functions like > the scan api to iterate over rocksdb keys quickly > Yes, I think so. > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 4:28 PM Matej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All. >> >> We like TiKV, it's fast, low level with low latency. But the problem is >> their java client is useless. >> >> Ignite 3 seems to go more in the storage direction. But he API seems >> high-level. We testes for speed and it seems much more slower then Ignite 2 >> and Tikv . >> >> Are there any plans for Ignite 3 to have more low level functions like >> the scan api to iterate over rocksdb keys quickly. And have everything more >> binary to not loose to much on schema stuff. >> >> Overall I really like the ignite 3 direction. >> >> BR >> >> Matej. >> >>
