Hi, so I dropped the table and simply recreated it. Did NOT restart the
application.

Now it works fine.

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:58 AM John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com> wrote:

> How? The code is 100% the same between production and dev. And it's part
> of a bigger application.
>
> Only dev has the issue. I will drop and recreate the table if that fixes
> the issue then what?
>
> You are saying mismatch, it's a string period.
>
> "select car_id from car_code where provider_id = ? and car_code = ? order by 
> car_id asc limit 1;"
>
>
> The first parameter is Integer and the second one is String. there's no
> way this can mismatch... And even if the String was a UUID it's still a
> string.
>
>     public JsonArray query(final String sql, final long timeoutMs, final
> Object... args) {
>         SqlFieldsQuery query = new SqlFieldsQuery(sql).setArgs(args);
>         query.setTimeout((int) timeoutMs, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
>
>         try (QueryCursor<List<?>> cursor = cache.query(query)) {
>             List<JsonArray> rows = new ArrayList<>();
>             Iterator<List<?>> iterator = cursor.iterator();
>
>             while(iterator.hasNext()) {
>                 List currentRow = iterator.next();
>                 JsonArray row = new JsonArray();
>
>                 currentRow.forEach(o -> row.add(o));
>
>                 rows.add(row);
>             }
>
>             promise.tryComplete(rows);
>         } catch(Exception ex) {
>         ex.printStackTrace();
>         }
>     }
>
>     Integer providerId = 1;
>     String carCode = "FOO";
>
>     query("select car_id from car_code where provider_id = ? and car_code
> = ? order by car_id asc limit 1;", 3000, providerId, cardCode);
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 6:50 AM Taras Ledkov <tled...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi John and Don,
>>
>> I guess the root cause in the data types mismatch between table schema
>> and actual data at the store or type of the query parameter.
>> To explore the gap, it would be very handy if you could provide a small
>> reproducer (standalone project or PR somewhere).
>>
>> > In my case I'm not even using UUID fields. Also the same code 2 diff
>> environment dev vs prod doesn't cause the issue. I'm lucky enough that it's
>> on dev and prod is ok.
>> >
>> > But that last part might be misleading because in prod I think it
>> happened early on during upgrade and all I did was recreate the sql table.
>> >
>> > So before I do the same on dev... I want to see what the issue is.
>> >
>> > On Tue., Aug. 2, 2022, 6:06 p.m. , <don.tequ...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I‘m only speculating but this looks very similar to the issue I had
>> last week and reported to the group here.
>> >>
>> >> Caused by: org.h2.message.DbException: Hexadecimal string with odd
>> number of characters: "5" [90003-197]
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best regards,
>> Taras Ledkov
>>
>

Reply via email to