Ok but since I dropped and recreated the table I'm fine? It won't somehow
throw that error again? And if I upgrade to 2.13 from 2.12 will I have the
same issue?

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:31 PM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> John Smith,
>
> Thank you. This issue will be fixed in upcoming 2.14.
>
> ср, 31 авг. 2022 г. в 21:50, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>:
>
>> Here it is... And yes I recently upgraded to 2.12 from 2.8.1
>>
>> create table if not exists car_code (
>> provider_id int,
>> car_id int,
>> car_code varchar(16),
>> primary key (provider_id, car_id)
>> ) with "template=replicatedTpl, key_type=CarCodeKey, value_type=CarCode";
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:25 AM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> John Smith,
>>>
>>> Can you please show DDL for the car_code table? Does PK of this table
>>> include provider_id or car_code columns?
>>> I found a compatibility issue, with the same behaviour, it happens when
>>> storage created with Ignite version before 2.11 is used with the newer
>>> Ignite version. Have you upgraded the dev environment with existing storage
>>> recently (before starting to get this error)?
>>>
>>>
>>> чт, 4 авг. 2022 г. в 17:06, John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Let me know if that makes any sense, because the test data is the same
>>>> and the application code is the same. Only dropped and created the table
>>>> again using DbEaver.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:39 AM John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, so I dropped the table and simply recreated it. Did NOT restart
>>>>> the application.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now it works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:58 AM John Smith <java.dev....@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How? The code is 100% the same between production and dev. And it's
>>>>>> part of a bigger application.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only dev has the issue. I will drop and recreate the table if that
>>>>>> fixes the issue then what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are saying mismatch, it's a string period.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "select car_id from car_code where provider_id = ? and car_code = ? 
>>>>>> order by car_id asc limit 1;"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first parameter is Integer and the second one is String. there's
>>>>>> no way this can mismatch... And even if the String was a UUID it's still 
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> string.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     public JsonArray query(final String sql, final long timeoutMs,
>>>>>> final Object... args) {
>>>>>>         SqlFieldsQuery query = new SqlFieldsQuery(sql).setArgs(args);
>>>>>>         query.setTimeout((int) timeoutMs, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         try (QueryCursor<List<?>> cursor = cache.query(query)) {
>>>>>>             List<JsonArray> rows = new ArrayList<>();
>>>>>>             Iterator<List<?>> iterator = cursor.iterator();
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             while(iterator.hasNext()) {
>>>>>>                 List currentRow = iterator.next();
>>>>>>                 JsonArray row = new JsonArray();
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 currentRow.forEach(o -> row.add(o));
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 rows.add(row);
>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             promise.tryComplete(rows);
>>>>>>         } catch(Exception ex) {
>>>>>>         ex.printStackTrace();
>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Integer providerId = 1;
>>>>>>     String carCode = "FOO";
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     query("select car_id from car_code where provider_id = ? and
>>>>>> car_code = ? order by car_id asc limit 1;", 3000, providerId, cardCode);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 6:50 AM Taras Ledkov <tled...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi John and Don,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess the root cause in the data types mismatch between table
>>>>>>> schema and actual data at the store or type of the query parameter.
>>>>>>> To explore the gap, it would be very handy if you could provide a
>>>>>>> small reproducer (standalone project or PR somewhere).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > In my case I'm not even using UUID fields. Also the same code 2
>>>>>>> diff environment dev vs prod doesn't cause the issue. I'm lucky enough 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> it's on dev and prod is ok.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > But that last part might be misleading because in prod I think it
>>>>>>> happened early on during upgrade and all I did was recreate the sql 
>>>>>>> table.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > So before I do the same on dev... I want to see what the issue is.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Tue., Aug. 2, 2022, 6:06 p.m. , <don.tequ...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> I‘m only speculating but this looks very similar to the issue I
>>>>>>> had last week and reported to the group here.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Caused by: org.h2.message.DbException: Hexadecimal string with
>>>>>>> odd number of characters: "5" [90003-197]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With best regards,
>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to