Hi Andrew, that actually works (although it didn't before). But we started going from the simple example I posted back to our original code, ironed everything out, and it works nicely.
Thanks a bunch! Nikola On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Andrew Phillips <andr...@apache.org> wrote: > Quoting Nikola Knežević <laladelausa...@gmail.com>: > >> On Jul 29, 2013, at 13:46 , Nikola Knezevic <laladelausa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> a small project (written by Marcus Brandenburger) that shows the >>> problem is available here: >>> <https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c139fae4b9065c703fa5> >>> >>> I modified it a little bit, to include the complete structure that our >>> code has. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Phillips <andr...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Could you create a Gist or Pastie of the section where you're creating >>>> the >>>> context and supplying the modules (if any) to be bound..? >> >> >> Hi guys, >> >> did anyone tried the project I send? Can anyone tell me whether the >> approach we took is good or not? > > > In MyCustomMultipartUploadModule [1], could you change the binding to a > linked binding [2], e.g. > > > bind(SequentialMultipartUploadStrategy.class).to(MyCustomMultipartUploadStrategy.class); > > instead of > > > bind(MultipartUploadStrategy.class).to(MyCustomMultipartUploadStrategy.class); > > ? > > Regards > > ap > > [1] > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c139fae4b9065c703fa5#file-mycustommultipartuploadmodule-java > [2] https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/LinkedBindings
