Right now svn is still the only "valid" source. Git-hub is just a mirror
and karaf isn't available at git.apache.org yet, this would require us to
transition the sources there which we haven't fully discussed yet. :-)

Regards, Achim

sent from mobile device
Am 25.01.2013 22:27 schrieb "Ryan Moquin" <fragility...@gmail.com>:

> Sounds great to me.  So out of curiosity, if I'm checking out the source,
> is it better for me to get it from github.com, git.apache.org, or apache
> svn?  It looks like JB checked in some changes when I look at the
> git.apache.org karaf-cellar repo, which I tried merging with my checkout
> from github.  Git said I was up to date though.  I tried checking out from
> svn and building and the build fails.  Is the build still not working or is
> something wrong on my end?  I just want to make sure that something isn't
> wrong on my end... I figured if JB checked some stuff in then it was
> probably working...
>
> Ryan
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Achim Nierbeck 
> <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Great to hear, and as I already said we love Contributions :D
>>
>> Yeah those pull requests from Github don't really work out well with
>> projects hosted at Apache.
>> So Patches is much easier and afaik also better for IP clearances :)
>>
>> thanks and regards, Achim
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin <fragility...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> That's my intention :-)   I did submit a couple the other day linked to
>>> Cellar pull requests regarding a discontinued Hazelcast component (JB
>>> already took care of that one), an issue with the version of the
>>> pax-mvn-url artifact and creating a kar for cellar as well as moving the
>>> config files around since when I build a custom Karaf archive, the cellar
>>> config files don't get put into the etc directory even though the features
>>> XML says they should be.  So contributing as much as I can is certainly my
>>> intent. :-)
>>>
>>> Anyhow, pull requests are a pain in the rear to get setup with the
>>> correct changes.. I think I should just go back to creating patch files and
>>> attaching those.
>>>
>>> I'm hoping once JB has a chance to check-in I'll be able to make some
>>> more contributions, Cellar is a project that really interests me subject
>>> matter wise, so I like digging around in it when something doesn't go as
>>> planned. :-)
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>> On Jan 22, 2013 3:07 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>
>>>> it's always nice to have some code contribution. And even nicer if
>>>> those are attached to Jira Issues ;)
>>>> Would be great if you could add some of the missing pieces as patches
>>>> to jiras.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks, Achim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin <fragility...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Awesome, OK, I figured but I wanted to check since I hadn't seen any
>>>>> check ins yet.  It was a good exercise in getting more familiar with the
>>>>> Cellar code, glad you already have it dealt with.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I've seen that one yet, but I guess I'll find out. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> No prob, when you check in those fixes I can move further on my usage
>>>>> of Cellar and see if I can fix anything that you haven't gotten to yet and
>>>>> submit.  Thanks for your work on Cellar, can't wait to see it working with
>>>>> the other project I'm working.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>> On Jan 21, 2013 9:46 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an
>>>>>> issue with Cellar Features which "pollutes" the Karaf features service.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will
>>>>>> commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0
>>>>>>> commands which are different. I also added a group manager property
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately,
>>>>>>> even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks
>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>> startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the
>>>>>>> "Karaf
>>>>>>> User Console" which didn't seem to make sense.  When it doesn't
>>>>>>> deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent
>>>>>>> modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being
>>>>>>> constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous
>>>>>>> threads.  When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating
>>>>>>> RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was
>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>> and added.  They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> problem to fix.... have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Hi Ryan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday.
>>>>>>>     It should be better by the end of this week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Regards
>>>>>>>     JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I
>>>>>>>         still wanted
>>>>>>>         to see if the build should be able to complete successfully
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>         not.  I
>>>>>>>         want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>         end or
>>>>>>>         not.  Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar
>>>>>>> trunk, is
>>>>>>>         that the current known state of it?  Or is it failing on my
>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>         only?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         Thanks,
>>>>>>>         Ryan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     --
>>>>>>>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>     jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
>>>> Commiter & Project Lead
>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
>> & Project Lead
>> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
>> Commiter & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to