Hi,

No concrete idea now, could you please append a test case which we can build 
and reproduce it?
Thanks
-------------
Freeman(Yue) Fang

Red Hat, Inc. 
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋

On 2013-4-2, at 下午3:30, Bengt Rodehav wrote:

> I've been using Karaf 2.3.0 for a while. I now tried to upgrade to Karaf 
> 2.3.1 but ran into problems with CXF.
> 
> I use cxf-codegen-plugin to generate code from a WSDL file so that I can call 
> the web service via a proxy. However, after upgrading to Karaf 2.3.1 I get 
> the following exception:
> 
> 2013-04-02 09:19:03,317 | ERROR | rint Extender: 3 | BlueprintContainerImpl   
>         | container.BlueprintContainerImpl  393 | Unable to start blueprint 
> container for bundle se.digia.connect.services.iso20022.iws-client
> org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException: Error when 
> instantiating bean iwsService of class class 
> se.digia.connect.iso20022.iwsclient.Client
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.getInstance(BeanRecipe.java:333)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.internalCreate2(BeanRecipe.java:806)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.internalCreate(BeanRecipe.java:787)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.AbstractRecipe$1.call(AbstractRecipe.java:79)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.AbstractRecipe.create(AbstractRecipe.java:88)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.createInstances(BlueprintRepository.java:245)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.createAll(BlueprintRepository.java:183)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.instantiateEagerComponents(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:668)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.doRun(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:370)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.run(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:261)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.ExecutorServiceWrapper.run(ExecutorServiceWrapper.java:106)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.utils.threading.impl.DiscardableRunnable.run(DiscardableRunnable.java:48)[7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.1.0]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:206)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)[:1.6.0_32]
> Caused by: javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder$ConfigurationError: Provider 
> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.spi.ProviderImpl not found
>       at javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder$2.run(FactoryFinder.java:130)
>       at 
> javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder.doPrivileged(FactoryFinder.java:229)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder.newInstance(FactoryFinder.java:124)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder.access$200(FactoryFinder.java:44)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder$3.run(FactoryFinder.java:220)
>       at 
> javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder.doPrivileged(FactoryFinder.java:229)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> javax.xml.ws.spi.FactoryFinder.find(FactoryFinder.java:160)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at javax.xml.ws.spi.Provider.provider(Provider.java:43)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at javax.xml.ws.Service.<init>(Service.java:35)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> se.digia.connect.iso20022.iwsclient.iws.IntegrationWebService.<init>(IntegrationWebService.java:30)
>       at 
> se.digia.connect.iso20022.iwsclient.Client.createProxy(Client.java:198)
>       at se.digia.connect.iso20022.iwsclient.Client.<init>(Client.java:35)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native 
> Method)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)[:1.6.0_32]
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.utils.ReflectionUtils.newInstance(ReflectionUtils.java:329)
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.newInstance(BeanRecipe.java:962)
>       at 
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BeanRecipe.getInstance(BeanRecipe.java:331)
>       ... 24 more
> 
> Has anything changed in Karaf 2.3.1 that could cause this? My main reason for 
> upgrading to Karaf 2.3.1 is the fixes that has been done to Aries blueprint - 
> could it cause this?
> 
> /Bengt

Reply via email to