Thanks JB, I did notice that Karaf provides servicemix-specs API bundles in lib\endorsed. It includes jaxws. I thought that these jar's overrode the JVM. If so, then you shouldn't need to modifiy the jre.properties - or have I got it all wrong?
/Bengt 2013/4/2 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > It's the jre.properties that I'm taking about. It should be provided in > etc/jre.properties.cxf. > > So the problem is not about a JRE package mismatch. > > I gonna take a deeper look (especially around the dependencies updates > between 2.3.0 and 2.3.1). > > Regards > JB > > > On 04/02/2013 10:38 AM, Bengt Rodehav wrote: > >> I found this blog post by Dan Kulp: >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog/**2011/11/apache-cxf-in-osgi/<http://www.dankulp.com/blog/2011/11/apache-cxf-in-osgi/> >> >> I modified the jre.properties accordingly but I still get the exact same >> stack trace. >> >> /Bengt >> >> >> 2013/4/2 Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com <mailto:be...@rodehav.com>> >> >> >> Hello Freeman, >> >> It would be a lot of work for me to narrow down my application to a >> simple test case. I'd really like to try other possibilities first, >> like: >> >> - Understanding how the factory pattern is supposed to work, >> espcially for Cxf >> - What has been changed in Karaf 2.3.1. that could affect this >> >> /Bengt >> >> >> 2013/4/2 Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com >> <mailto:freeman.f...@gmail.com**>> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> No concrete idea now, could you please append a test case which >> we can build and reproduce it? >> Thanks >> －－－－－－－－－－－－－ >> Freeman(Yue) Fang >> >> Red Hat, Inc. >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >> Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ >> Twitter: freemanfang >> Blog: >> http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com<http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> >> >> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/**1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042> >> weibo: @Freeman小屋 >> >> On 2013-4-2, at 下午3:30, Bengt Rodehav wrote: >> >> I've been using Karaf 2.3.0 for a while. I now tried to >>> upgrade to Karaf 2.3.1 but ran into problems with CXF. >>> >>> I use cxf-codegen-plugin to generate code from a WSDL file so >>> that I can call the web service via a proxy. However, after >>> upgrading to Karaf 2.3.1 I get the following exception: >>> >>> 2013-04-02 09:19:03,317 | ERROR | rint Extender: 3 | >>> BlueprintContainerImpl | >>> container.**BlueprintContainerImpl 393 | Unable to start >>> blueprint container for bundle >>> se.digia.connect.services.**iso20022.iws-client >>> org.osgi.service.blueprint.**container.** >>> ComponentDefinitionException: >>> Error when instantiating bean iwsService of class class >>> se.digia.connect.iso20022.**iwsclient.Client >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BeanRecipe.** >>> getInstance(BeanRecipe.java:**333)[7:org.apache.aries.** >>> blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BeanRecipe.** >>> internalCreate2(BeanRecipe.**java:806)[7:org.apache.aries.** >>> blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BeanRecipe.** >>> internalCreate(BeanRecipe.**java:787)[7:org.apache.aries.** >>> blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.**AbstractRecipe$1.call(** >>> AbstractRecipe.java:79)[7:org.**apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.**1.0] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(** >>> FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_**32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**FutureTask.run(FutureTask.** >>> java:138)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.di.**AbstractRecipe.create(** >>> AbstractRecipe.java:88)[7:org.**apache.aries.blueprint.core:1.**1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BlueprintRepository.** >>> createInstances(**BlueprintRepository.java:245)[** >>> 7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.**core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BlueprintRepository.** >>> createAll(BlueprintRepository.**java:183)[7:org.apache.aries.** >>> blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.**BlueprintContainerImpl. >>> **instantiateEagerComponents(**BlueprintContainerImpl.java:** >>> 668)[7:org.apache.aries.**blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.** >>> BlueprintContainerImpl.doRun(**BlueprintContainerImpl.java:** >>> 370)[7:org.apache.aries.**blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.** >>> BlueprintContainerImpl.run(**BlueprintContainerImpl.java:** >>> 261)[7:org.apache.aries.**blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**Executors$RunnableAdapter.** >>> call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6.**0_32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(** >>> FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_**32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**FutureTask.run(FutureTask.** >>> java:138)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.** >>> ExecutorServiceWrapper.run(**ExecutorServiceWrapper.java:** >>> 106)[7:org.apache.aries.**blueprint.core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**utils.threading.impl.** >>> DiscardableRunnable.run(**DiscardableRunnable.java:48)[** >>> 7:org.apache.aries.blueprint.**core:1.1.0] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**Executors$RunnableAdapter.** >>> call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6.**0_32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(** >>> FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_**32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**FutureTask.run(FutureTask.** >>> java:138)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$** >>> ScheduledFutureTask.access$**301(**ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.** >>> java:98)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$** >>> ScheduledFutureTask.run(**ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.** >>> java:206)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.** >>> runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.**java:886)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> java.util.concurrent.**ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(** >>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)[:**1.6.0_32] >>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.**java:662)[:1.6.0_32] >>> Caused by: javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder$** >>> ConfigurationError: >>> Provider org.apache.cxf.jaxws.spi.**ProviderImpl not found >>> at javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder$2.run(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:130) >>> at >>> javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder.doPrivileged(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:229)[:1.6.**0_32] >>> at >>> javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder.newInstance(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:124)[:1.6.**0_32] >>> at >>> javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder.access$200(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:44)[:1.6.0_**32] >>> at javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder$3.run(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:220) >>> at >>> javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder.doPrivileged(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:229)[:1.6.**0_32] >>> at >>> javax.xml.ws.spi.**FactoryFinder.find(** >>> FactoryFinder.java:160)[:1.6.**0_32] >>> at javax.xml.ws.spi.Provider.**provider(Provider.java:43)[:1.** >>> 6.0_32] >>> at javax.xml.ws.Service.<init>(**Service.java:35)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> se.digia.connect.iso20022.**iwsclient.iws.** >>> IntegrationWebService.<init>(**IntegrationWebService.java:30) >>> at >>> se.digia.connect.iso20022.**iwsclient.Client.createProxy(** >>> Client.java:198) >>> at >>> se.digia.connect.iso20022.**iwsclient.Client.<init>(** >>> Client.java:35) >>> at >>> sun.reflect.**NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.** >>> newInstance0(Native >>> Method)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> sun.reflect.**NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.**newInstance(** >>> NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.**java:39)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> sun.reflect.**DelegatingConstructorAccessorI**mpl.newInstance(** >>> DelegatingConstructorAccessorI**mpl.java:27)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> java.lang.reflect.Constructor.**newInstance(Constructor.java:** >>> 513)[:1.6.0_32] >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**utils.ReflectionUtils.** >>> newInstance(ReflectionUtils.**java:329) >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BeanRecipe.** >>> newInstance(BeanRecipe.java:**962) >>> at >>> org.apache.aries.blueprint.**container.BeanRecipe.** >>> getInstance(BeanRecipe.java:**331) >>> ... 24 more >>> >>> Has anything changed in Karaf 2.3.1 that could cause this? My >>> main reason for upgrading to Karaf 2.3.1 is the fixes that has >>> been done to Aries blueprint - could it cause this? >>> >>> /Bengt >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
