Hi JB, sounds good. Thank you.
Can you keep me informed? Would it make sense (e.g. for log alert usage) to enhance the checker configuration also for multiple matches (excludes)? E.g. type log, * property level should match WARN AND * property message should not contain the regex foobar (or should contain the regex) Or we could filter some loc.class and loc.method log messages that we know are "false positives". Am Mo., 8. Juli 2019 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > > Hi Markus, > > Correct, but you raised a valid point. Let me do the improvements on the > checker, adding an option to "always" send the alert, ignoring previous > ones. > > I imagine something like: > > log.level.warn.always=.... > > I do the change for Decanter 2.3.0 and I will cut the release asap. > > OK for you ? > > Regards > JB > > On 08/07/2019 15:04, Markus Rathgeb wrote: > >> In the case of log, it's a bit special: you receive an alert as soon as > >> you have a log.level in WARN, and it's stored in the Decanter alerts. > >> Then, the next log message which is not a WARN will notify you. > >> > >> I need to improve a bit the mail alerter to only send the first email in > >> the case of log (it makes sense for metrics, like the ones coming from > >> the JMX collector). > > > > So, it is more like state entered and state exited. ? > > > > Let's assume the following log messages: > > > > * INFO 0 > > * WARN 1 > > * WARN 2 > > * WARN 3 > > * WARN 4 > > * INFO 5 > > * INFO 6 > > * WARN 7 > > * INFO 8 > > > > Is it correct that I will only receive mails for "WARN 1", "INFO 5", > > "WARN 7" and "INFO 8"? > > > > If I would like to get a mail per WARN log message, I need to write my > > own log appender? > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
