Great, thanks ! Regards JB
On 08/07/2019 16:40, Markus Rathgeb wrote: > Here it is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-6355 > > I did not find how to change the "assign to" field. > Perhaps I don't have the power. > > I don't know which title would be a good one - feel free to change it. > > Am Mo., 8. Juli 2019 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré > <j...@nanthrax.net>: >> >> Sure ! and thanks for your feedback ! >> >> Do you mind to create a corresponding Jira and assign to me ? Else I >> will later today. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 08/07/2019 16:20, Markus Rathgeb wrote: >>> Hi JB, >>> >>> sounds good. >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Can you keep me informed? >>> >>> Would it make sense (e.g. for log alert usage) to enhance the checker >>> configuration also for multiple matches (excludes)? >>> >>> E.g. type log, >>> * property level should match WARN >>> AND >>> * property message should not contain the regex foobar (or should >>> contain the regex) >>> >>> Or we could filter some loc.class and loc.method log messages that we >>> know are "false positives". >>> >>> >>> >>> Am Mo., 8. Juli 2019 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> <j...@nanthrax.net>: >>>> >>>> Hi Markus, >>>> >>>> Correct, but you raised a valid point. Let me do the improvements on the >>>> checker, adding an option to "always" send the alert, ignoring previous >>>> ones. >>>> >>>> I imagine something like: >>>> >>>> log.level.warn.always=.... >>>> >>>> I do the change for Decanter 2.3.0 and I will cut the release asap. >>>> >>>> OK for you ? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 08/07/2019 15:04, Markus Rathgeb wrote: >>>>>> In the case of log, it's a bit special: you receive an alert as soon as >>>>>> you have a log.level in WARN, and it's stored in the Decanter alerts. >>>>>> Then, the next log message which is not a WARN will notify you. >>>>>> >>>>>> I need to improve a bit the mail alerter to only send the first email in >>>>>> the case of log (it makes sense for metrics, like the ones coming from >>>>>> the JMX collector). >>>>> >>>>> So, it is more like state entered and state exited. ? >>>>> >>>>> Let's assume the following log messages: >>>>> >>>>> * INFO 0 >>>>> * WARN 1 >>>>> * WARN 2 >>>>> * WARN 3 >>>>> * WARN 4 >>>>> * INFO 5 >>>>> * INFO 6 >>>>> * WARN 7 >>>>> * INFO 8 >>>>> >>>>> Is it correct that I will only receive mails for "WARN 1", "INFO 5", >>>>> "WARN 7" and "INFO 8"? >>>>> >>>>> If I would like to get a mail per WARN log message, I need to write my >>>>> own log appender? >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
