Hi,

Does it mean that you are using features repository in json format ?

Regards
JB

> Le 24 mai 2021 à 12:44, Steven Huypens <steven.huyp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi JB,
> 
> I've found a VersionCleaner class in org.apache.felix.utils.version, which is 
> being used in Karaf. But as far as I can see, this class doesn't 'clean' 
> leading zeroes.
> 
> I did see however that the method readNumber() in 
> org.apache.karaf.util.json.JsonReader seems to skip the leading zero. This 
> results in a 'wrong' version number in the list of installedFeatures in 
> org.apache.karaf.features.internal.service.State I'm assuming that's the 
> reason why my feature does not get installed.
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Steven
> 
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 6:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net 
> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
> 
> Don’t get me wrong: it’s in the feature/osgi version parser (powered by Felix 
> utils), not in the spec.
> 
> http://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v41/org/osgi/framework/Version.html 
> <http://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v41/org/osgi/framework/Version.html>
> 
> The spec allows leading 0, however, I think that the Felix Util version 
> parser removes it.
> 
> Let me check in Felix.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 23 mai 2021 à 19:47, Steven Huypens <steven.huyp...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:steven.huyp...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi JB,
>> 
>> Thanks for your response. I guess we'll have to change our versioning scheme 
>> then. Do you have a reference to the OSGi spec stating leading zeroes are 
>> not allowed ? I might have to convince some people ;-)
>> 
>> Also, it would be convenient to have at least a WARN in the logging about 
>> this, it took us quite some time to figure out what we were doing wrong. I'd 
>> be happy to create a PR if that would help, but you will have to point me to 
>> the code where this has to be changed.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Steven
>> 
>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 5:11 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net 
>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>> 
>> I would consider as "works as designed" ;)
>> 
>> The OSGi version parser expects "flat" versioning.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>> > Le 23 mai 2021 à 11:06, Steven Huypens <steven.huyp...@gmail.com 
>> > <mailto:steven.huyp...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> > 
>> > Hi All,
>> > 
>> > When using a bootFeature with a leading zero in the version number (eg. 
>> > 1.01.1-SNAPSHOT), the feature gets state UNINSTALLED after starting Karaf. 
>> > All my bundles are OK, it's only the state of the feature that seems 
>> > wrong. When I remove the leading zero (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT), the feature gets 
>> > state STARTED, as expected.
>> > 
>> > Should I consider this a bug or is there a specification telling us not to 
>> > use leading zeroes for version numbers ?
>> > 
>> > Best regards,
>> > Steven 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to