Good find, Kevin! On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:13 AM Kevin Risden <[email protected]> wrote:
> -1 found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1645 > > All other testing went well minus Zeppelin UI due to KNOX-1645. I'll > respin a new rc later today. > > Tested the following: > > - src zip - mvn verify -Ppackage,release > - knoxshell - able to connect to Knox and execute a few examples > - Ran rc2 against https://github.com/risdenk/knox-performance-tests to > test unsecure webhdfs, hbase, hive > - Manual testing of UIs with Kerberos > - Zeppelin UI with websocket enabled > - Manual testing of Knox against Kerberized cluster > - knoxsso Pac4j backed by Okta > - hadoopauth provider > - token service and Bearer tokens > - default topology url > - topology port mapping > - ambari discovery > - hadoop group provider > > Kevin Risden > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:41 PM larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All - >> >> Thanks to Kevin for so much work in cleaning up the backlog and taking on >> release manager work for 1.2.0! >> >> The 1.2.0 release happens to contain many dependency upgrades. >> Not the least of which is Jetty itself from 9.2.x to 9.4.x. >> >> We need to put some key areas through their paces pretty rigorously in >> order to tease out any corner case regressions. >> >> For instance, any Jetty specific features - such as: >> * Websocket support >> * SSL configuration params >> * buffer size tweaks >> * comb the gateway config and see which things are configuring aspects of >> Jetty where units of measure defaults may change, etc >> >> * Pac4J was upgraded - we will need KnoxSSO testing of SAML via Okta, >> Google Authenticator, etc. >> >> * Classloading is already known to have changed and has caused some issues >> that have already been found. >> Give some thought into possible classloading issues: singletons, custom >> providers added to the ext directory, etc. >> >> If anyone can think of other corner cases that may not be immediately >> covered by default and common configurations please call them out and/or >> list what you have tested for them. >> >> thanks! >> >> --larry >> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:16 PM Jeffrey Rodriguez <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 , based on my review and testing. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jeffrey E Rodriguez >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM >> Kevin Risden >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Release candidate #2 for the Apache Knox 1.2.0 release is available >> at: >> > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-1.2.0/ >> > > >> > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> > > >> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git >> > > Branch v1.2.0 (git checkout -b v1.2.0) >> > > Tag is v1.2.0-rc2 (git checkout -b v1.2.0-rc2) >> > > >> > > The KEYS file for signature validation is available at: >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS >> > > >> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 1.2.0. >> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> > > least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast. >> > > >> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 1.2.0 >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> > > >> > > Kevin Risden >> > > >> > >> >
