Outstanding. Keep up the great work! From: larry mccay <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 at 7:35 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Knox 1.2.0 RC 2
Good find, Kevin! On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:13 AM Kevin Risden <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: -1 found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1645 All other testing went well minus Zeppelin UI due to KNOX-1645. I'll respin a new rc later today. Tested the following: * src zip - mvn verify -Ppackage,release * knoxshell - able to connect to Knox and execute a few examples * Ran rc2 against https://github.com/risdenk/knox-performance-tests to test unsecure webhdfs, hbase, hive * Manual testing of UIs with Kerberos * Zeppelin UI with websocket enabled * Manual testing of Knox against Kerberized cluster * knoxsso Pac4j backed by Okta * hadoopauth provider * token service and Bearer tokens * default topology url * topology port mapping * ambari discovery * hadoop group provider Kevin Risden On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:41 PM larry mccay <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All - Thanks to Kevin for so much work in cleaning up the backlog and taking on release manager work for 1.2.0! The 1.2.0 release happens to contain many dependency upgrades. Not the least of which is Jetty itself from 9.2.x to 9.4.x. We need to put some key areas through their paces pretty rigorously in order to tease out any corner case regressions. For instance, any Jetty specific features - such as: * Websocket support * SSL configuration params * buffer size tweaks * comb the gateway config and see which things are configuring aspects of Jetty where units of measure defaults may change, etc * Pac4J was upgraded - we will need KnoxSSO testing of SAML via Okta, Google Authenticator, etc. * Classloading is already known to have changed and has caused some issues that have already been found. Give some thought into possible classloading issues: singletons, custom providers added to the ext directory, etc. If anyone can think of other corner cases that may not be immediately covered by default and common configurations please call them out and/or list what you have tested for them. thanks! --larry On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:16 PM Jeffrey Rodriguez <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 , based on my review and testing. > > Thanks, > Jeffrey E Rodriguez > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM Kevin Risden <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Release candidate #2 for the Apache Knox 1.2.0 release is available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-1.2.0/ > > > > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git > > Branch v1.2.0 (git checkout -b v1.2.0) > > Tag is v1.2.0-rc2 (git checkout -b v1.2.0-rc2) > > > > The KEYS file for signature validation is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 1.2.0. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 1.2.0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > Kevin Risden > > >
