Hi,The resource type name validation in publication.rng is too rigid IMHO. If there is a reason for not allowing '-' and '_' in resource type names, it should be documented. If not, it would be nice to be able to use '-' and '_'.
WDYT? Regards, Markus Angst --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
