Hi Andreas,
The resource type name validation in publication.rng is too rigid IMHO.
If there is a reason for not allowing '-' and '_' in resource type
names, it should be documented. If not, it would be nice to be able to
use '-' and '_'.
IMO special characters shouldn't be allowed, to reduce the risk of
failing pipelines etc.
If I understand it right (which is never sure with a W3C standard :-)) the XML
standard would allow these characters in names and attribute values. On the
other hand it is clear, that we are talking about a purely cosmetic problem
here. I think it is not worth taking a risk to solve this.
But what we should do is add a human-readable name to resource types,
which is e.g. displayed in the menu ("New ... document").
You mean to change what is done in the menu xsps ATM?
Regards,
Markus Angst
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
