Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Rainer Schöpf schrieb:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Andreas Hartmann schrieb:
> > Hi Rainer,
> > > > Rainer Schöpf schrieb:
> > > > […]
> > > > > Improve the TinyMCE integration by making
tiny_valid_elements.js and the
> > > RelaxNG schema compatible (if possible).
> > > > I guess this would affect the BXE integration, wouldn't it?
> > Apart from that – I'm a little hesitant regarding schema
changes in minor
> versions. What about existing content? Even if the schema is less
strict than
> before, the resulting content might break existing applications.
Agreed.
Which reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask for some
time: the xhtml.rng file includes xhtml-basic.rng, but has comments
about changing this to XHTML transitional or XHTML strict. Would that
be an acceptable change?
Given my last statement, I'd have to say no :) But I think as long as
we stick to a standard, and old content remains editable, we could
consider changing the schema. IMO XHTML transitional is a bad
compromise for a content storage format, but AFAIK the default XHTML
support of Firedocs is targeted to the transitional schema, so maybe
we'll have to switch to this schema anyway when we want to support
Firedocs.
WDOT?
-- Andreas
Well the problem here is that BXE does not validate the rng when we
switch it to strict or transitional. Is this a BXE bug or a bug in our rng?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
