On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 21:24, Martin Kleppmann <mar...@eptcomputing.com> wrote: >> I'm willing to handle the initial project setup, but there are a >> couple of >> points that need clarification before I can go ahead : >> - Which licence to use ? both neo4j and neo4j-resources are released >> under >> the AGPL licence. But in this case, imho, a more liberal licence, >> such as >> the ASF, would be more suitable. But the code is mostly yours, so, >> it's your >> call. > > I only released neo4j-resources under AGPL because I thought I had to > (due to being linked with Neo). However I'm no expert in these > matters. If Neo's AGPL permits it, I'm happy to license the Scala > stuff under pretty much whatever. MIT license is my favourite these > days, because it's so nice and short. :)
MIT X license is compatible with the AGPLv3 so that works. The Apache License is compatible so works as well. > >> - The project name : neo-scala ? > > Is the project officially called Neo or Neo4j? I guess the latter is a > lot more findable on Google. Would that mean it would be more > systematic to name it neo4j-scala? I don't mind though. I'd prefer 'neo4j-scala' for the google-ability of it all. We're a bit of a mess there right now but I'm hoping we can clean that up to consistently use neo4j. > >> - Would you agree to use Specs as the test framework as it's natively >> integrated with maven ? > > Sounds good! This sounds great guys. Please keep us in the loop as you progress! Cheers, -- Emil Eifrém, CEO [e...@neotechnology.com] Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com Cell: +46 733 462 271 | US: 206 403 8808 http://blogs.neotechnology.com/emil http://twitter.com/emileifrem _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
