Hi, Tobias. Actually, I think we'll use your approach for the "known relationships" and "known types" (there are quite a few in our domain model) in addition to the dynamic approach.
Thanks for the help! Rick -----Original Message----- From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Ivarsson Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 8:54 AM To: Neo user discussions Subject: Re: [Neo] Type metadata in properties/nodes I see. I realized that this was what you were after. What I was proposing was that you would know the types for the properties given the type of the node. The types for the nodes in your case would be more abstract, perhaps just defined by the set of properties. I used concrete types in my explanation because it usually helps people understand what I mean with utilizing the navigation context. I had a suspicion that your particular application might not benefit from this approach, but I wanted to throw it into the mix for the sake of completeness of the discussion, since there are a lot more people reading the list than writing in a particular thread. Cheers, Tobias _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
